Scandal on cruise: Man receives 9,000 euros after urine incident!

Scandal on cruise: Man receives 9,000 euros after urine incident!

An unusual incident on a cruise ship has followed legal consequences. A passenger was accused of urinating in a glass at the bar, which led to his immediate warning and finally to exclude the trip. This happened after several guests and crew members observed this incident. However, the affected man contested the act and was certain that the measures were wrong. After a country excursion, he was asked by the captain to leave the ship together with his acquaintances and had to organize his return trip at his own expense. The incident caused a sensation and led to a legal dispute.

Then the man complained against the termination of his travel contract without notice. The Düsseldorf Regional Court decided in favor of the passenger and declared the shipping company's measures illegally. In its judgment, the court found that the man's behavior was inappropriately but not violent, which did not justify termination without notice without prior warning. The on -board reference was only pronounced three days after the incident. The man now receives a proportionate reimbursement of the travel price, which amounts to over 4,300 euros, as well as compensation for lost holiday joys of almost 3,100 euros, i.e. a total of around 9,000 euros. T-Online reports that ...

Details of the incident

The incident that led to this legal discussion occurred at the bar of the cruise ship, where the accused passenger supposedly urinated in a glass and then put it on the table. Crew members reported a clear urine hole. Despite the stressful statements, the man held on to his innocence.

The court's decision that the incident does not represent a serious breach of duty means that the shipping company should have given a warning before serious measures are taken. It was also noteworthy that other fellow travelers who were only present were also asked to leave the ship, even though they were not actively involved in the incident.

The court's evaluation shows that behavior was classified as inappropriate, but not as threatening or discriminatory for security on board. The decision could now have far -reaching implications for the cruise industry, especially how comparable incidents are treated in the future.