Marius ’yurt in danger: building authority demands immediate evacuation!

Marius ’yurt in danger: building authority demands immediate evacuation!

Chiemgau, Deutschland - Marius Diab has been living in a yurt for a decade that he built from thrown away material. The 38-year-old originally started with a consumption strike to draw attention to the waste of resources and lived from what others no longer wanted for four years. A year ago he moved to Chiemgau to be closer to his four -year -old daughter. But his unconventional home is outdoors, 250 meters from the next village, which is not allowed according to building law. The building authority gave Diab time until June 30th to move, otherwise the fines are at risk of fines or even a forced evacuation, such as tz.de reported.

The search for a new place is difficult for diab. So far he has not found any suitable places and describes the legal situation for alternative forms of living such as yurts, weighing or tiny houses. He sees these USN disaster in a larger social context. Many people have similar challenges and could benefit from a change in legislation, especially in times of housing shortage.

legal situation of yurts in Germany

The legal situation for yurts is complex in Germany and depends on various factors. According to the information on yurt.de there are different regulations both indoors and outdoors. Inside, approvals for yurts are increasingly granted in the context of the sustainability change. However, the process often remains expensive, cumbersome and lengthy. Preliminary clarifications or legal support are therefore recommended.

Other standards apply to the outdoor area. For example, yurts can be used as temporary accommodations for renovations. They are often seen as a "flying building", which means that they can be quickly assembled and dismantled without leaving any residues. Farmers enjoy certain advantages, especially when building yurts for animal husbandry.

prospects and challenges

Society could benefit from a collective ignoring of laws perceived as senseless to cause changes. Marius Diab hopes for a natural, quiet place with infrastructure and a registration address for himself and his daughter. If someone knows a suitable place, they can reach diab at marius.diab@riseup.net. Since he also works as a climbing tree carer, the traffic safety of trees in cities is important to him. He also lives in his yurt with two cats.

Overall, the case shows how important the legal framework for alternative forms of living are. Hope for a change in the law is not only for him, but for many people in similar situations.