Marius' yurt in danger: building authorities demand immediate evacuation!
Marius Diab lives in a yurt in Chiemgau and is fighting against the threat of eviction. The article highlights his fate and legal challenges.

Marius' yurt in danger: building authorities demand immediate evacuation!
Marius Diab has been living in a yurt that he built from discarded materials for a decade. The 38-year-old originally started a consumer strike to draw attention to the waste of resources and lived for four years on what others no longer wanted. A year ago he moved to Chiemgau to be closer to his four-year-old daughter. But his unconventional home is located outside, 250 meters from the nearest village, which is not allowed according to building regulations. The building authority has given Diab until June 30th to move, otherwise he could face fines or even eviction tz.de reported.
Finding a new place is proving difficult for Diab. He has not yet found any suitable locations and describes the legal situation for alternative forms of living such as yurts, wagons or tiny houses as problematic. He sees this USN disaster in a larger social context. Many people have similar challenges and could benefit from a change in legislation, particularly in times of housing shortage.
Legal situation of yurts in Germany
The legal situation for yurts in Germany is complex and depends on various factors. According to the information on yurt.de There are different regulations both indoors and outdoors. Indoors, permits for yurts are increasingly being granted in the context of the sustainability transition. However, the process often remains expensive, complicated and lengthy. Preliminary clarifications or legal support are therefore recommended.
Different standards apply for outdoor areas. For example, yurts can be used as temporary accommodation during renovations. They are often viewed as a “flying structure,” meaning they can be assembled and dismantled quickly without leaving any residue. Farmers enjoy certain advantages, especially when building yurts for animal husbandry.
Prospects and challenges
Society could benefit from a collective ignoring of perceived senseless laws to bring about change. Marius Diab is hoping for a quiet, natural place with infrastructure and a registration address for himself and his daughter. If anyone knows of a suitable spot, they can reach Diab at marius.diab@riseup.net. Since he also works as a climbing arborist, the traffic safety of trees in cities is important to him. He also lives in his yurt with two cats.
Overall, the Diab case shows how important the legal framework for alternative forms of housing is. The hope for a change in the law is important not only for him, but for many people in similar situations.